Safety First: Why EMA Liquid Outperforms MMA
Safety First: Why EMA Liquid Outperforms MMA

Did you know that acrylic nails were discovered by mistake? Back in the 1950s, a dentist named Fred Slack broke his fingernail. He used a dental material called Methyl Methacrylate (MMA) to fix it. Because it worked so well, it became popular for fake nails too.
But here is the truth: MMA is a harmful chemical for your nails.

In the 1970s, many people complained that MMA was hurting their fingers and nails. After studying it, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) said that liquid MMA is a “dangerous and poisonous substance” and should not be used on nails.

Even though it’s dangerous, some places still use it because it is very cheap—much cheaper than the safe choice, Ethyl Methacrylate (EMA). They use it to save money, but it can turn customers away from getting nails done forever because of a bad experience.

After MMA was found to be unsafe, salons needed a better solution. That’s where Ethyl Methacrylate (EMA) came in!

As nail professionals you are trusted to do what is right by and for your customers, especially when they don’t know any better. Every good nail technician must choose products that are safe, like EMA. All it takes is one dangerously poor experience at a salon before the entire industry loses a customer, potentially forever. We, together, have to consistently put the duty to do right by our clients and customers at the top of the priority list.